DJIA38904.04 307.06
S&P 5005204.34 57.13
NASDAQ16248.52 199.44
Russell 20002060.10 8.70
German DAX18163.94 -238.49
FTSE 1007911.16 -64.73
CAC 408061.31 -90.24
EuroStoxx 505013.35 -57.20
Nikkei 22538992.08 -781.06
Hang Seng16723.92 -1.18
Shanghai Comp3069.30 -5.66
KOSPI2714.21 -27.79
Bloomberg Comm IDX102.90 0.64
WTI Crude-fut91.17 0.01
Brent Crude-fut86.57 1.15
Natural Gas1.79 0.00
Gasoline-fut2.79 -0.01
Gold-fut2345.40 33.50
Silver-fut27.50 0.46
Platinum-fut940.60 -5.50
Palladium-fut1007.40 -23.60
Copper-fut423.60 1.85
Aluminum-spot1815.00 0.00
Coffee-fut212.50 5.75
Soybeans-fut1185.00 5.00
Wheat-fut567.25 11.00
Bitcoin67976.00 304.00
Ethereum USD3328.10 56.27
Litecoin98.71 0.69
Dogecoin0.18 0.00
EUR/USD1.0862 0.0007
USD/JPY151.72 -0.02
GBP/USD1.2678 0.0016
USD/CHF0.9044 -0.0014
USD IDX104.28 0.08
US 10-Yr TR4.4 0.091
GER 10-Yr TR2.406 0.007
UK 10-Yr TR4.064 -0.005
JAP 10-Yr TR0.771 -0.004
Fed Funds5.5 0
SOFR5.32 0

Latest News

Evening Brief – 03.10.23

Shares of Silicon Valley Bank’s parent company SVB Financial Group plummeted 60% on Thursday, another 20+% in after-hours trading, then a trading halt on Friday, wiping out more than $80 billion from its market capitalization, culminating with a shutdown by regulators and control by the FDIC.

Silicon Valley Bank was known for its investments in what has now been deemed bubbly tech, and as the Fed continues its aggressive monetary policy stance much of the capital and liquidity that was there is leaving the system.

The bank’s investments were heavily concentrated in mortgage-backed securities. But not just any type of MBS – about 97% of them were 10-year maturity MBS that the bank planned to hold until maturity.

At the time, the investments made sense as US Treasuries were providing a 0-0.25% return, while the MBS products had a yield above 1.5%.

The fact is the lifeblood – capital – for innovative firms, fintech companies among them, is going to be a bit harder to come by now. The same businesses that were key clients of Silicon Valley Bank – venture capital-backed tech and life sciences startups made up about 50% of the bank’s assets – had been drawing down on their deposits.

SVB is not exclusive to these events. Numerous US banks are in a similar situation. They are all holding long-duration assets that were bought in a zero-interest rate environment and now those assets are theoretically under water. Although it’s not necessarily systemic contagion, sentiment contagion could be just as damaging or even more damaging to the financial markets.

Connect

Inside The Story

About Joe Palmisano

Joe Palmisano is Editorial Director for Connect Money, where he brings nearly three decades experience of market insights as a financial journalist, analyst and senior portfolio manager for leading financial publications, advisory firms, and hedge funds. In his role as Editorial Director, Joe is responsible for the selection of content and creation of daily business news covering the financial markets, including Alternative Assets, Direct Investment and Financial Advisory services. Before joining Connect Money, Joe was a financial journalist for the Wall Street Journal, regularly publishing feature stories and trend pieces on the foreign exchange, global fixed income and equity markets. Joe parlayed his experience as a financial journalist into roles as a Senior Research Analyst and Portfolio Manager, writing daily and weekly market analysis and managing a FX and US equity portfolio. Joe was also a contributing writer for industry magazines and publications, including SFO Magazine and the CMT Association. Joe earned a B.S.B.A. in Finance from The American University. He holds the Chartered Market Technician (CMT) designation and is a member of the CFA Institute.