
Infrastructure Allocations Enter Maturity Phase as Growth Moderates
Institutional investors are entering a new era of infrastructure investing marked by steadier allocation growth, resilient returns and shifting geographic and sector preferences, according to the 2026 Institutional Infrastructure Allocations Monitor released by Hodes Weill & Associates and Cornell University’s Brooks Center for Infrastructure.
For the first time since the survey launched, more than half of institutional investors report being at or above their target allocations to infrastructure. Target allocations rose to 6.2% in 2026, up 30 basis points year-over-year and 110 basis points since 2023. Applied to an estimated $147 trillion global institutional asset base, that implies roughly $441 billion in potential incremental capital.
“For the first time, a majority of investors report being at or above their target allocations, underscoring infrastructure’s evolution into a core component of institutional portfolios,” said Doug Weill, Managing Partner at Hodes Weill.
The report’s conviction score, a measure of investor sentiment toward the asset class, rose to a four-year high of 7.3 out of 10. Returns came in at 9.1%, marking a third consecutive year of strong performance and holding within a narrow band of 8.8% to 9.2% across 2023 to 2025.
Yet the deployment picture is more complicated. Infrastructure portfolios remain under-allocated by an average of 106 basis points relative to targets, up slightly from last year. First-time funds remain largely shut out, while established platforms continue to consolidate their dominance.
Sector preferences are shifting in ways that reflect both opportunity and caution. Energy infrastructure has overtaken digital infrastructure as the top area of focus, with roughly one-third of institutions planning to increase energy allocations. The rotation is away from pure-play renewables and toward utilities, transmission, grid infrastructure, and storage.
Digital infrastructure’s growth trajectory remains closely tied to power demand, particularly as artificial intelligence and data center expansion drive investment in dedicated energy supply, cooling systems, and grid capacity.
Geographically, Europe has displaced North America as the leading preference for new allocations, with 39% of investors planning to increase European exposure versus 30% for North America.
On ESG, the transatlantic divide has widened sharply. In the U.S., 42% of institutions now rate ESG as not at all important. No European institution reported holding that view. The report notes a nuanced dynamic: some managers appear to be maintaining the same underlying risk processes and personnel while publicly stepping back from ESG and DEI messaging.
“The sustained growth in institutional allocations reflects increasing confidence in the asset class’s ability to deliver resilient returns while supporting critical investments in energy, transportation, digital connectivity, and other essential systems,” said Dr. Rick Geddes, Founder and Academic Director of Cornell’s Brooks Center for Infrastructure.
The report is based on responses from 142 institutional investors across 26 countries, representing more than US$11.5 trillion in assets under management and approximately US$590 billion in infrastructure investments.

